Pages: [1] 2 |
1. QQ CCP can we please have our now useless sp back? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Though I havent used one yet, I think Tech 3s are great. Its something for everyone. Older players can get one to get that extra bit of bonus. And newer players can save a bit of cash and a hell of a lot of training time getting a ship that can...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2011.01.25 16:01:00
|
2. Hoods from character creator don't carry through? - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Edited by: Conroy Peckerwood on 18/01/2011 22:27:12 No hood on the picture I chose, though I had just taken a picture with the hood on in the same slot. No hood on character selection either. No hood ingame... well except others see me with th...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2011.01.18 22:26:00
|
3. What level V skills would you avoid? - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Pottsey Originally by: Ultim8Evil Large Beam/Pulse Laser Spec 5 33 days 6 hours for 2% Damage? No thanks. Marauders 5 42 days 23 hours for 7.5% Repair Amount and 5% Damage Ok, it's a nice bonus, but if you ...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2010.09.04 12:05:00
|
4. Drone scoop range back to 1500m?? - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Edited by: Conroy Peckerwood on 25/04/2009 11:19:31 after a disconnect I was going back to scoop my drones. could scoop them to cargo at < 2500m but not to drone bay until I was within 1500m I've submitted a bug report to that effect. So i...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.04.25 11:18:00
|
5. STEALTH BOMBERS NOW SUCK! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Conroy Peckerwood on 18/04/2009 12:57:09 Originally by: Shereza Not to be too blunt but for your quasi-quoting of the description you failed to quote anything that clearly stated: I kill frigates, It's what I do, I blow'em u...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.04.18 12:53:00
|
6. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Conroy Peckerwood on 13/04/2009 11:14:48 I dont really get why we have the racial damage bonus. The ships are rather different when looking at speed, target range, hit points, slot layout, and fitting stats. Is it a good thing that...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.04.13 11:14:00
|
7. wtb t2 orca - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
makes me hungry for a trippledecker
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.04.11 08:34:00
|
8. cancel local in the form its today has... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Nice one Kamen
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.04.07 21:17:00
|
9. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Leon Caedo In general, comparing things from real life to this (or any) game isn't the best strategy for a good argument. To summarize from another post in another thread - right now a gang of recon/ewar ships' main weakne...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.04.07 20:34:00
|
10. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I really think this stealth bomber needs to have its niche changed to focus on taking out enemy recon/ewar ships. These ships are tough to engage for most other ships, except maybe the interceptors. In regular warfare, stealth bombers are used to...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.04.07 19:55:00
|
11. Falcon balance - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Caldari Citizen4714 Originally by: Verone The fact...... I think I generally agree with you. It's not a solopwnmobile but it's damn good at its job. What's a good anti-falcon? Something a gang could bring along s...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.03.15 18:00:00
|
12. "Massive Attack" of spamming bots - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Conroy Peckerwood on 15/03/2009 17:39:29 ISK spammers brighten my day with their engrish
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.03.15 17:35:00
|
13. The Top 100 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
so far this is a top 12 of narcisist DOH make that 13 :P
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.03.15 17:24:00
|
14. How did you choose your name? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Put my real name through a pirate name generator. LOVED THE RESULT! If you can reversen engineer it to get my real name, Ill buy you a beer :P
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2009.03.15 17:22:00
|
15. A Simple Lag Solution for 500+ Fleet Battles - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So, if you were in lots and lots of fleet battles and your friend was in a more lonely place, he would age faster than you and get more SP?
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2007.10.11 13:30:00
|
16. The carrier debate - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Oh and why you would use a ship worth a billion without fittings to protect assets worth maybe 150 million each, is beyond me. Ok. If you have 10 friends in hulks mining, Im starting to see your point. But then no single ship could protect them fr...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2007.10.11 02:53:00
|
17. The carrier debate - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Conroy Peckerwood on 11/10/2007 02:48:12 For small gangs and in low sec.. Hmm use a battleship or a battle cruiser. Oh yeah a definatly a battlecruiser or a commandship. you could even train mining foreman and and use the gang link...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2007.10.11 02:47:00
|
18. Speed Tank - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Conroy Peckerwood on 11/10/2007 02:32:15 Originally by: ProjectUnknown Originally by: Acoco Osiris Need to get it out to 16km to avoid medium neuts. Anyways, the standard nanoship setup is as follows As many missile...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2007.10.11 02:30:00
|
19. this is my Patch idea... hope everyone talks about it.. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Used to play another game, where we had a Roleplaying filter. How it worked was that you could substitute words or phrases for different stuff... Like "LFG" to "Looking For Group" and such. Of course being dememnted as I am, I had other uses for i...
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2007.09.29 08:24:00
|
20. Nerf to Sensor Damps? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I was wondering.. Is a Target Painter a counter to Sensor Dampeners? Increasing the signature radius of the target should make it easier to lock. Im only guessing it works like this and I have no idea if it would be effective at all..
- by Conroy Peckerwood - at 2007.09.26 12:40:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |